Since our last blog on 28 January 2025, the Renters’ Rights Bill has been intensely debated in both Houses of Parliament. The Bill is now approaching final stages and is expected to receive Royal Assent soon. The House of Lords made a number of amendments intended to refine protections for tenants while addressing concerns raised by landlords and the student housing sector.
This blog explores the proposed provisions to change residential tenancies and the amendments suggested by the House of Lords but it is worth noting at the outset that we do not expect many (if any) of the proposed changes to be adopted although government has in some instances attempted to respond to these suggestions. We will know more once the report stage has concluded.
The Renters’ Rights Bill – Updated with House of Lords Amendments
| Provision | Original Proposed Provision | Lords – Committee Stage22 April 2025 to 15 May 2025 | Moore Barlow’s Prediction of Likely Final Outcome |
| 1. Abolition of Section 21 | Section 21 notices, which allow landlords to evict tenants without needing to give a reason, will be abolished. Evictions will instead require specific grounds under Section 8. | While the abolition remains intact, peers raised concerns about court readiness and delays in possession proceedings. | Full abolition on Royal Assent |
| 2. Rent Arrears Grounds | Introduced new higher arrears grounds. Mandatory possession for rent arrears will only be possible where the tenant is in three months of arrears, rather than two. | House of Lords Amendments:New Ground for Repeated Arrears: Landlords can evict under a new mandatory ground if the tenant has been two months in arrears on three separate occasions within three years, even if arrears are cleared by the hearing. Debate on Threshold: Some peers pushed to retain the two-month threshold due to concerns about landlords carrying arrears for too long, but this was not adopted. | Higher arrears threshold & longer notices |
| 3. Advance Rent Payment Limit | Landlords can only request one month’s rent in advance, regardless of tenant circumstances. | The Lords agree that there should be limits on advanced rent payments to prevent exploitation of tenants, however, they also want the regulations to be practical for landlords renting to international students without guarantors and tenants without poor credit ratings.Current Status:The one-month cap stands.Possible exemptions for students or high-risk tenants may follow in secondary legislation, but are not in the primary Renters’ Rights Bill. Implication: Letting agents and landlords must avoid demanding more than one month’s rent upfront. A civil penalty of up to £5,000 can be imposed for breaches. However, tenants may choose to pay more voluntarily. | Advanced rent is likely to be capped at one month |
| 4. Student Tenancies | New Amendments Introduced:Time Limit on Pre-letting: The possession ground for student landlords (ground 4A) is only available if the tenancy was agreed no more than 6 months in advance of the start date.Exemption for PBSA (Purpose-Built Student Accommodation): Registered PBSAs to be exempt from the requirement to convert to periodic tenancies. They can still offer fixed-term contracts. | House of Lords Response: The Lords acknowledge that the student housing market should be treated differently to the private residential letting market whilst still ensuring protection for both type of tenants.Implication: The government has recognised the unique cycle of student lettings and adjusted the Renters’ Rights Bill to reflect these needs but in a fairly limited way. Traditional landlords letting to students may face some restrictions and issues with the new ground in respect of timings. Secondary legislation will be needed to properly cater for PBSA.. | HMO exemption retained |
| 5. Landlord Ombudsman | Original Proposed Provision: All private landlords must join a newly created Ombudsman scheme for tenant complaints. | House of Lords Response:Tenants can go directly to the Ombudsman – no need for internal resolution first.Ombudsman decisions will be binding, with powers to award up to £25,000 in compensation.Funded by landlord registration fees under the national database scheme.The Lords intent is to give tenants an accessible route with meaningful redress through the ombudsman. By professionalising landlords, they hope to encourage better service to tenants and more responsible management of tenancies from landlords.Implication: A strong new enforcement mechanism giving tenants meaningful, cost-free recourse. Landlords will face reputational and financial risks if found at fault. | Ombudsman to be established |
| 6. Landlord & Property Database | Original Proposed Provision: A mandatory national database for landlords and rented properties, detailing compliance status. | Further Details via Amendments:Database will also include rent levels, compliance with repairs and standards, and whether the landlord has a history of enforcement actions.Local authorities can impose penalties of up to £40,000 for serious or repeat non-compliance.House of Lords Response: The Lords intention with the National Landlord and Property Database is to introduce a system that promotes transparency, accountability and enforcement across the private rental sector. The Lords want to go further and make it a regulatory and public information tool | Database likely to be implemented |
| 7. Rent Increases | Only one rent increase per year, using a Section 13 notice.Must be market-aligned, and tenants receive 2 months’ notice.Rent increases cannot be backdated. | First-Tier Tribunal can only reduce or maintain rent — not increase it.Tenants can now challenge increases through the new Ombudsman as well. House of Lords Response: The Lords intention with the rent increase proposal is to prevent unfair and opportunistic rent hikes by landlords while ensuring that rents can still be increased to market rate levels.Implication: Tenants are better protected from arbitrary or unfair rent hikes. Landlords must provide evidence to prove that the proposed rent increase is based on market rates. | Rent increases limited to once every 12 months capped at market rate |
| 8. Ban Rental Bidding | Landlords and agents cannot solicit or accept offers above the advertised rent. | House of Lords Amendments:Fines up to £7,000 for each breach.Repeat breaches can lead to further penalties and referral to the database with enforcement follow-up.Response: The Lords intention is to end the silent auction culture particularly in areas of high demand which leads to unfair inflation of the rental market. In order to deter this behaviour there will be financial and reputational consequences.Implication: The aim is to end bidding wars and gazumping in the rental market. Listings must reflect true asking prices. | Ban fully enforced |
| 9. Decent Homes & Awaab’s Law | There will be a legal obligation to meet a standard of housing that is “fit to rent” which is modelled on the Decent Homes Standard and Awaab’s Law. | House of Lords Amendments:There will be strict timeframes for addressing hazards like mould or damp.Landlords can be penalised if they fail to act within set response and remedy periods.Enforcement will be by Ombudsman and local councils.Response: The Lords intention with the Decent Home Standard and Awaab’s Law provisions is to ensure that health and safety standards are enforceable in the private rented sector. They want every rental home to be safe and habitable. Landlords must act quickly when hazards arise. Implication: Landlords must proactively maintain safe homes. Delays in handling issues like mould could have legal and financial consequences. There will be an expectation for landlords to carry out regular inspections to adopt preventative housing management. | Standards enforced |
| 10. Discrimination Protections | Discrimination based on benefits status, children, or disability is explicitly banned. | The House of Lords did not offer major amendment here, but cross-party support reinforced these protections.Implication: Landlords and agents must ensure tenant selection processes comply with equality laws. Enforcement via local councils and ombudsman. | Protections remain |
| 11. Guarantor Liability Post-Death | New Amendment: Landlords can no longer recover rent from a guarantor after the death of the tenant. | House of Lords Response: The Lords intention is to protect guarantors from rent recovery demands after a tenant has passed away. The Lords wish to close a loophole that could result in hardship for guarantors who are also likely to be grieving relatives after the passing of the tenant. Implication: Guarantors are protected from unexpected obligations. Tenancy agreements will need to be amended to reflect this position if this aspect is incorporated into the Act. | Liability ends on tenant death |
| 12. Penalties & Enforcement | Rent repayment orders doubled to 24 months.Fines up to £40,000 for persistent non-compliance.Local Councils must enforce and report. | House of Lords Response The intention is to target repeat offenders and give Councils more funding and powers for enforcement.Implication: Stronger deterrents. Poorly behaved landlords risk being barred from using eviction grounds or operating in the sector. | Robust enforcement remains |
Final Thoughts and Sector Impact of the Renters’ Rights Bill
The Renters’ Rights Bill (see the bill here) represents a significant change to the private rental market. While welcomed by tenant advocacy groups, it has also sparked concern among landlords, particularly around increased regulation, restrictions on possession, and added costs. The House of Lords amendments aimed to moderate some of the more controversial areas, especially around student housing and rent arrears, while maintaining core protections for tenants. What we can see from the Committee debates and market chatter though is that it is unlikely that many (if any) of these changes will be adopted into the draft legislation and it is likely to go for Royal Assent in much the same form as it was.
On that assumption, as the Renters’ Rights Bill moves toward Royal Assent, landlords should begin preparing by:
- Reviewing their assets/portfolios and considering what if any steps they might want to take whether specifically on tenancies or broader sales;
- Serving s21 notices where appropriate before the Bill is passed
- Reviewing current tenancy agreements to consider what changes might be imposed/effected by the legislation;
- Ensuring they meet decent home standards;
- Planning for compliance with the new national database;
- Evaluating rent increase practices; and
- Avoiding upfront rent requests that breach the new limits.
Despite uncertainty ahead, landlords who manage their properties responsibly should find the transition manageable — and tenants will gain greater clarity, security, and recourse in the rental process with the more balanced relationship leading to better outcomes for the majority of landlord and tenant relationships.
How Moore Barlow can help
Working collaboratively with our commercial disputes and transactional real estate colleagues, our Real Estate Disputes team draws on a breadth of experience and expertise to provide you with a service of the highest quality.
We have considerable experience advising commercial landlords, developers, lenders, commercial tenants, private individuals and landowners. Our approach focusses on providing advice at an early stage to help you reach a cost-effective solution as quickly as possible.
